My Stepson and I Tagged Out at the Same Time. My Buck Was One of the Biggest Ever Taken in Colorado
Last updated: August 8, 2026
A Historic Colorado Hunt Revisited: The 1978 Mule Deer That Still Ranks Among the State's Greatest
In a remarkable convergence of timing and skill, a hunter and his stepson recently achieved a rare "tag-out" success in Colorado, with the adult hunter harvesting one of the largest mule deer bucks ever recorded in the state. The story behind this achievement is not a new event, but a retrospective look at a legendary hunt that occurred over four decades ago, which has now been officially recognized by the Boone and Crockett Club as the second-typical mule deer buck taken in Colorado history.
The specific harvest took place in April 1978, as detailed in an article originally published in Outdoor Life. The buck, which was harvested during a shared hunting trip with the author's stepson, has maintained its status as a benchmark for Colorado mule deer. According to recent verification and award ceremonies held last July at the Denver Museum of Natural History, the animal is now ranked as the No. 2 typical mule deer in the state's history.
The Legend of the 1978 Harvest
The narrative that has resurfaced describes a hunt where both the father figure and his stepson successfully tagged out on their respective animals. While the article highlights the shared success, the primary focus of the new recognition is the buck taken by the author. This specific animal has achieved a level of notoriety that extends well beyond its initial harvest date.
The official score recorded for this trophy is 207 and 2/8 inches. It is important to note a correction made during the recent award process: while the original text of the Outdoor Life article listed scores of 209 and 3/8, the verified Boone and Crockett Club score stands at 207 and 2/8. Despite this minor discrepancy in historical records, the animal remains a statistical powerhouse.
The significance of this buck is underscored by its current standing. As of the recent award ceremony, it ranks as the No. 64 typical mule deer of all time on a global basis, and specifically as the second-largest typical mule deer ever taken in Colorado. This places it in an elite category of wildlife records that few hunters can aspire to match.
The Award Ceremony
Last July, the formal recognition of this achievement took place at the Denver Museum of Natural History. The author received the Boone and Crockett Club award for the No. 2 typical mule deer buck in state history. This ceremony serves as a reminder that while hunting technology and data collection have evolved since the late 1970s, the fundamental skill required to harvest such an animal remains constant.
The event highlighted the enduring legacy of the hunt. The author noted that the buck remains one of the biggest typical mule deer ever taken in Colorado. The fact that a harvest from 1978 continues to hold such a high ranking demonstrates the quality of the mule deer populations in certain regions of the state during that era, as well as the precision of the hunter involved.
The Context of the Hunt
To understand the magnitude of this achievement, one must consider the conditions under which it was taken. The hunt occurred in April 1978, a time when hunting regulations and population management differed from today's standards. The fact that a buck of this caliber was harvested during a trip shared with a younger hunter suggests a high level of mentorship and patience.
The original article, titled "2-for-2 Trophy Hunt," emphasized the rarity of both hunters achieving their goals simultaneously. In the context of mule deer hunting, where success rates can be low and the animals are notoriously elusive, tagging out on two large bucks in a single trip is an event that defines a career.
The correction of the score from 209 3/8 to 207 2/8 during the recent verification process illustrates the rigorous standards maintained by the Boone and Crockett Club. This level of scrutiny ensures that the records kept for state and national rankings are accurate, preserving the integrity of hunting history.
Equipment and Methodology
While the specific details of the equipment used in 1978 were not provided in the original text, the article mentions that Winchester was roaring. This likely refers to the firearm or ammunition used during the hunt. Winchester has a long history of manufacturing firearms and ammunition for hunting, and their products have been a staple for hunters seeking reliability and performance.
The mention of a Leupold scope also appears in the context of this story. Leupold is renowned for its optical equipment, providing clarity and precision that are essential for long-range shooting or spotting game in rugged terrain. The use of such high-quality optics would have been critical in identifying the massive buck among a herd and ensuring an ethical harvest.
The combination of skilled marksmanship, appropriate equipment, and favorable conditions allowed the hunter to secure one of the most significant mule deer records in Colorado history. The fact that this hunt is still being discussed decades later speaks to the quality of the animal and the skill required to take it.
What This Means for Hunters
The re-emergence of this story serves as an inspiration for modern hunters. It highlights that while hunting conditions change, the potential for taking exceptional game remains. The ranking of this buck as the No. 2 typical mule deer in Colorado history suggests that there are still opportunities to encounter animals of this caliber.
For those interested in pursuing similar trophy hunts, the story underscores the importance of preparation and respect for the animal. The use of reliable equipment, such as firearms from manufacturers like Winchester and optics from Leupold, can play a significant role in success.
The correction of the score also reminds hunters that accurate record-keeping is vital. Whether for personal satisfaction or competitive ranking, ensuring that measurements are precise helps maintain the integrity of hunting records and honors the animals harvested.
Looking Forward
As hunting continues to evolve with new technologies and regulations, stories like this one provide a bridge between past achievements and future aspirations. The recognition of the 1978 buck as the No. 2 typical mule deer in Colorado history ensures that it remains a benchmark for hunters to strive toward.
Hunters interested in learning more about trophy hunting or improving their skills might look into the equipment used during such hunts. While specific models from 1978 may not be available today, modern equivalents from manufacturers like Winchester and optical companies like Leupold continue to offer high performance.
The legacy of this hunt will likely continue to inspire future generations. As the Boone and Crockett Club maintains its records, hunters can look to these historical benchmarks to understand what is possible in the field. The story of the 1978 Colorado mule deer remains a testament to the enduring appeal of the sport.
You might also be interested in: State of the Firearms Industry: Market Analysis 2026
You might also be interested in: Rising Ammunition Costs: Understanding the Market
You might also be interested in: Biggest Firearm Innovations of 2026 So Far
Conclusion
The recent recognition of the 1978 mule deer harvest as one of the state's greatest achievements serves as a powerful reminder of the history and tradition of hunting in Colorado. From the initial tag-out by the author and his stepson to the formal award ceremony at the Denver Museum of Natural History, this story encapsulates the spirit of the sport.
The detailed verification of the score, the placement on national rankings, and the continued discussion of the hunt all contribute to a deeper appreciation of what it takes to harvest such an animal. Whether through the use of classic equipment or modern innovations, the pursuit of trophy game remains a central pillar of hunting culture.
This page may contain affiliate links. We earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. Disclosure